The amendment process of the Constitution is a crucial feature that ensures the adaptability and continuity of the Indian constitutional framework. Part XX of the Constitution of India, consisting solely of Article 368, lays down the procedure and scope for constitutional amendments. For aspirants preparing for the UPSC Civil Services Examination, understanding Article 368 is essential, as it reflects the balance between rigidity and flexibility in the Constitution.
Historical Background and Need for Amendment
The framers of the Constitution were aware that no constitution can remain static. India, being a diverse and evolving society, required a system that could respond to changing socio-economic and political realities. Borrowing inspiration from constitutions like those of the USA and UK, the framers devised a flexible yet controlled amendment process.
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar emphasized that the Constitution should neither be too rigid nor too flexible. Article 368 embodies this philosophy by providing different procedures for different types of amendments.
Article 368: Scope and Structure
Article 368 deals with two fundamental aspects:
- Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution
- Procedure for amendment
It grants the Parliament of India the authority to amend the Constitution, subject to certain limitations.
Procedure for Amendment under Article 368
The Constitution prescribes a special procedure for amendment, which differs from ordinary legislative procedures. The steps are as follows:
1. Introduction of Amendment Bill
An amendment can be initiated only by introducing a bill in either House of Parliament (Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha). Unlike ordinary bills:
- It does not require prior permission of the President.
- It can be introduced by either a minister or a private member.
2. Special Majority Requirement
The bill must be passed in each House by a special majority, which includes:
- A majority of the total membership of the House, and
- A majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.
This ensures that constitutional amendments are not passed casually.
3. Ratification by States (When Required)
For certain amendments that affect the federal structure, the Constitution mandates ratification by at least half of the State Legislatures. These include matters related to:
- Election of the President
- Distribution of legislative powers between the Centre and States
- Judiciary
- Representation of States in Parliament
4. Assent of the President
After being passed by Parliament (and ratified by states where necessary), the bill is presented to the President. The President must give assent—there is no power to withhold or return the bill.
Types of Amendments in the Indian Constitution
Though Article 368 primarily deals with constitutional amendments, not all amendments follow the same procedure. Broadly, amendments can be classified into three types:
1. Amendments by Simple Majority
These are not considered amendments under Article 368 and can be passed like ordinary legislation. Examples include:
- Formation of new states
- Changes in citizenship provisions
- Delimitation of constituencies
2. Amendments by Special Majority
Most constitutional amendments fall under this category and require the special majority of Parliament.
3. Amendments by Special Majority + State Ratification
These amendments affect the federal structure and require approval by at least half of the states.
Doctrine of Basic Structure
One of the most significant developments related to Article 368 is the Doctrine of Basic Structure, evolved by the Supreme Court of India.
Origin: Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973)
In the landmark Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, the Supreme Court ruled that:
Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, but it cannot alter the basic structure.
Elements of Basic Structure
Though not exhaustively defined, some key elements include:
- Supremacy of the Constitution
- Sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India
- Secularism
- Federalism
- Judicial review
- Rule of law
- Separation of powers
This doctrine acts as a limitation on the amending power of Parliament.
Evolution of Amending Power: Key Amendments and Judgments
1. Golaknath Case (1967)
In I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab, the Supreme Court held that Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights.
2. 24th Constitutional Amendment Act (1971)
This amendment restored Parliament’s power to amend Fundamental Rights and made it mandatory for the President to give assent.
3. Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973)
It upheld Parliament’s power but introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine.
4. 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act (1976)
Often called the “Mini Constitution,” it attempted to make Parliament’s amending power unlimited.
5. Minerva Mills Case (1980)
In Minerva Mills v. Union of India, the Supreme Court struck down parts of the 42nd Amendment and reaffirmed the Basic Structure Doctrine.
Key Features of Article 368
1. Balance between Rigidity and Flexibility
The Constitution is neither too rigid like the US Constitution nor too flexible like the British system. This hybrid model ensures adaptability without compromising stability.
2. Parliamentary Sovereignty with Judicial Supremacy
While Parliament has the power to amend, the judiciary ensures that amendments do not violate the basic structure.
3. Federal Safeguards
State ratification ensures that federal principles are preserved.
4. No Referendum Requirement
Unlike some countries, India does not require a referendum for constitutional amendments.
Limitations on the Amending Power
Article 368 imposes both procedural and substantive limitations:
Procedural Limitations
- Special majority requirement
- State ratification (in certain cases)
Substantive Limitations
- Basic Structure Doctrine (judicially evolved)
Comparison with Other Constitutions
- USA: Highly rigid; amendments require approval by states and Congress.
- UK: Highly flexible; Parliament can amend through ordinary laws.
- India: A balanced approach combining rigidity and flexibility.
Importance of Article 368 for UPSC Aspirants
For UPSC preparation, Article 368 is crucial because:
- It is frequently asked in both Prelims and Mains.
- It connects with topics like federalism, judiciary, and Fundamental Rights.
- It reflects the dynamic nature of the Constitution.
In Mains answers, referencing landmark cases like Kesavananda Bharati and Minerva Mills adds analytical depth.
Part XX of the Constitution, through Article 368, provides a well-structured mechanism for constitutional amendments. It empowers the Parliament of India to adapt the Constitution to changing needs while safeguarding its core principles through judicial oversight.
The evolution of the amendment process, especially through landmark judgments by the Supreme Court of India, highlights the dynamic interplay between the legislature and judiciary. The Doctrine of Basic Structure ensures that while the Constitution evolves, its foundational values remain intact.
For aspirants, mastering Article 368 is not just about understanding procedures but appreciating the philosophical and legal foundations of constitutional governance in India.
Discover more from UPSC Xplainer
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
